Comparing Orion Vs. Arc Browser [7 Features and Pros & Cons]

When considering different web browsers, it often boils down to individual preferences and specific needs.

Two options that have captured the attention of tech-savvy users lately are the Orion browser and ARC. But when it comes to “Orion browser vs. Arc,” which one holds the edge? Let’s delve in.

Brief Introduction to Orion Browser

Orion Browser is a relatively new player in the world of web browsing, but it has managed to create a niche for itself thanks to its focus on privacy and performance.

Fun Fact #1: Despite its recent entry into the market, Orion Browser has already earned a reputation for its impressive loading speed and energy efficiency, which could give your device's battery a much-needed breather!

Brief Introduction to Arc Browser

On the other hand, ARC has gained popularity as a robust, feature-rich browser. It has been lauded for its user-friendly interface and compatibility across multiple platforms.

A common query is “Is ARC built on Chrome?”. Indeed, ARC is built on Chromium, the open-source project that underlies Google Chrome, contributing to its versatile functionality and widespread compatibility.

Fun Fact #2: ARC's name is an acronym for Advanced RISC Computing, reflecting its focus on advanced, reduced instruction set computing architectures – a nod to its performance-centric design approach.

This comprehensive comparison blog post will cover everything from features to performance, privacy and security, usability, compatibility, and community support.

Purpose of the Comparison

We aim to provide a clear, unbiased overview of both browsers, comparing their features, performance, privacy, security aspects, user experience, and more.

Remember, choosing a web browser isn’t simply about picking the one with the most features or the fastest speeds. It’s about finding the one that aligns best with your specific needs and preferences.

Before we dive into the detailed comparison, exploring our in-depth review of the Orion web browser might be helpful for more context about its unique features and capabilities.

We will also touch upon Orion’s privacy features, but you can find a more exhaustive overview in our dedicated post on Orion browser’s privacy.

Orion vs. Arc

Here are the detailed features comparison of both Orion and ARC web browsers;

1. Feature Comparison

When it comes to browsers, features are a big deal. They significantly impact your browsing experience, offering various tools and options to make your digital navigation smoother and more efficient.

Tab Management

Tab management is crucial for a seamless browsing experience, particularly if you open multiple tabs simultaneously.

In the case of “Orion browser vs. Arc,” both offer unique takes on tab management.

Orion Browser, for instance, provides a visual tab manager, enabling users to navigate their open tabs more effectively.

On the other hand, ARC comes with a neat tab grouping feature, allowing you to cluster related tabs together for a more organized view.

Bookmarking System

Bookmarks are essential for quick access to your favorite websites. Orion’s bookmarking system allows for easy management of your saved sites with options for customization.

ARC, too, provides a competent bookmarking system, with the added benefit of synching across devices if you’re using the browser on multiple platforms.

Incognito/Private Browsing

Both browsers offer a private or incognito mode, an essential feature for users concerned about their digital privacy.

While browsing in this mode, neither browser will save your browsing history, cookies, site data, or information entered in forms.

Search Capabilities

ARC shines when it comes to search capabilities, thanks to its Chromium foundation. It offers a seamless search experience akin to that of Chrome.

Orion, however, isn’t far behind, with efficient search functionality and customizable search engine preferences.

Add-ons and Extensions

Extensions can significantly enhance browser functionality. Due to its Chromium base, ARC supports a vast library of Chrome extensions.

Orion also supports a range of useful extensions, though the library isn’t as extensive as ARC’s.

For a deeper understanding of the pros and cons of a Chromium-based browser like ARC, don’t miss our post on the advantages and disadvantages of Chromium.

2. Performance Analysis

This is about how quickly a browser can load web pages, how efficiently it uses system resources, and its overall reliability can significantly impact the user experience.

Speed Test Results

Both Orion and ARC are designed for speedy browsing, but how do they fare in a head-to-head speed test?

Based on various standard benchmarks, Orion generally displays a faster page load speed thanks to its lightweight design and efficient resource utilization.

However, with its robust Chromium backbone, ARC also boasts commendable load speeds, particularly on websites designed to take advantage of Chrome’s unique capabilities.

Resource Utilization

A browser that hogs system resources can slow down your device and impact productivity. Thankfully, both Orion and ARC are quite efficient in this regard.

Orion Browser is especially light on system resources, often using less RAM than its competitors.

While slightly more resource-intensive due to its extensive features, ARC still performs better than many mainstream browsers.

Mobile Performance

Performance on mobile devices is just as important, considering the growing number of users browsing the web on their smartphones.

ARC’s mobile version maintains a consistent browsing speed and efficient resource use, much like its desktop counterpart.

While not quite as fast as ARC on mobile devices, Orion still offers respectable performance with the added advantage of saving battery life.

In terms of performance, both Orion and ARC offer reliable, speedy browsing experiences.

Depending on your specific needs, such as whether you value page load speed over resource use or vice versa, one may be a better fit.

3. Privacy and Security Comparison

The web browser you choose can significantly impact how your personal information is handled and protected. Let’s see how Orion and ARC fare in this important category.

Data Handling and User Privacy

For the privacy-conscious, Orion Browser is a strong contender. It’s built to focus on privacy and does not track users’ online activities.

Orion also provides an array of customizable privacy settings, allowing users to tailor their browsing experience according to their comfort level.

ARC, on the other hand, takes advantage of the robust security infrastructure of its Chromium foundation.

While this means ARC provides secure browsing, it’s worth noting that some user data may be collected for functional purposes.

The key difference between the two lies in their respective philosophies – Orion’s focus is primarily on user privacy. At the same time, ARC leans more towards providing rich features backed by Chromium’s security mechanisms.

Security Features

Regarding security, both browsers have standard features such as built-in pop-up blockers, anti-phishing protection, and secure browsing warnings.

Orion offers additional security features like script blocking, while ARC provides sandboxing technology, an advanced security feature to prevent malware from affecting the rest of your system.

4. Usability and User Experience

The user experience is at the heart of any software application, and web browsers are no exception.

User Interface

Orion Browser offers a minimalistic, clean interface, which appeals to those who prefer a simplified, clutter-free browsing experience.

On the contrary, ARC, while maintaining a user-friendly layout, incorporates more intricate design elements, reflecting its extensive range of features.

Navigation and Customization

Both Orion and ARC provide easy-to-navigate interfaces. Orion stands out with its highly customizable user interface, allowing users to modify elements to suit their personal preferences.

On the other hand, ARC, thanks to its Chromium roots, offers a familiar navigation structure, particularly for users transitioning from Chrome.

Learning Curve

Considering the learning curve, Orion may take some time to get used to, especially for users familiar with traditional browsers due to its distinct design and feature set.

ARC, built on Chromium, has a lower learning curve, especially for those who have used Chrome.

In conclusion, the choice between Orion and ARC may come down to individual preferences. If you appreciate a minimalist, highly customizable interface and don’t mind a bit of a learning curve, Orion might be your best bet.

But, if you prefer a feature-rich interface with a familiar layout and navigation style, ARC could be the perfect match.

5. Compatibility Comparison

A browser’s compatibility can be a decisive factor, particularly if you’re using multiple devices or rely on specific web apps for work or leisure.

Operating System Compatibility

Orion Browser and ARC are both designed to be compatible with multiple operating systems. They support popular platforms such as Windows, macOS, and Linux.

Orion also offers a version optimized for iOS, making it a great option if you’re an Apple user. ARC, with its Chromium foundation, also extends support for Android devices.

Web Technologies and Standards

Given ARC’s Chromium base, it naturally supports various web technologies and standards, including HTML5, JavaScript, CSS, and more.

This ensures that most websites and web apps will run smoothly on ARC.

Orion, while also supporting various web standards, might face compatibility issues with certain web apps that rely heavily on proprietary Chrome technologies.

That said, Orion works flawlessly for regular web browsing and standard web applications.

Web App Compatibility

Thanks to its Chromium roots, ARC offers excellent compatibility with a range of web apps, including those developed specifically for Chrome.

It handles complex, feature-rich web apps well, making it a reliable choice for power users.

On the other hand, Orion focuses more on speed and privacy, which might lead to certain trade-offs in compatibility with heavy, resource-intensive web apps.

However, it handles standard web apps efficiently.

In conclusion, both browsers offer compatibility with various operating systems and web technologies. With its Chromium foundation, ARC has a slight edge in compatibility with complex web apps.

Still, Orion’s focus on speed and privacy and its compatibility with major operating systems make it a strong contender.

6. Community Support and Documentation

Access to comprehensive documentation and a responsive, active community can significantly enhance your experience with a browser.


Orion Browser provides detailed documentation, offering an in-depth overview of its features and functionalities. It also includes troubleshooting guides and FAQs to help users resolve any issues.

Powered by Chromium, ARC has extensive documentation covering various topics, from basic navigation to advanced customization.

The fact that it’s built on Chromium means that users can also leverage the vast resources available for Chrome, providing an added advantage.

Community Support

Community support can often make or break the user experience with the software. Orion has a small yet dedicated community ready to assist fellow users.

They have forums where users can ask questions, report issues, or share tips and tricks.

On the other hand, ARC benefits from a larger community due to its connection to Chromium.

Users can find plenty of forums, discussion groups, and resources where they can seek help or share their experiences.

In conclusion, both Orion and ARC have considerable community support and thorough documentation, ensuring that users can find the help they need when needed.

7. Pros and Cons

Like any software, both Orion and ARC come with their strengths and weaknesses.

Orion Browser

  • Privacy-Focused: Orion is designed with privacy at its core. It does not track users’ activities, providing a safe browsing environment.
  • Lightweight and Fast: Orion is known for its speed and efficient resource utilization, which can result in faster page load times.
  • Customizable User Interface: Orion offers a highly customizable interface, allowing users to tailor their browsing experience to their preferences.
  • Learning Curve: Orion’s unique design and feature set can pose a slight learning curve, especially for users accustomed to traditional browsers.
  • Limited Web App Compatibility: While Orion handles most web apps efficiently, it may face compatibility issues with certain resource-intensive apps that rely heavily on proprietary Chrome technologies.

ARC Browser

  • Feature-Rich: Being built on Chromium, ARC offers many features and supports a vast library of Chrome extensions.
  • Excellent Web App Compatibility: ARC handles complex, feature-rich web apps well, making it a reliable choice for power users.
  • Familiar User Interface: ARC’s user interface will be familiar to users transitioning from Chrome, reducing the learning curve.
  • Data Collection: While ARC offers a secure browsing experience, it does collect some user data for functional purposes, which might not sit well with privacy-focused users.
  • Resource Use: While still efficient, ARC can be slightly more resource-intensive than Orion due to its extensive features.

In conclusion, both Orion and ARC have their distinct advantages and disadvantages.

When choosing between the two, it’s essential to consider these pros and cons and how they align with your specific needs.

Final Verdict

Choosing between Orion Browser and ARC isn’t straightforward because each offers unique strengths. The right browser for you largely depends on your requirements and preferences.

If you prioritize privacy and a minimalist, highly customizable interface, Orion Browser could be your ideal choice.

Its focus on user privacy and efficient resource utilization, coupled with a clean interface, makes it an excellent choice for users seeking a streamlined, privacy-conscious browsing experience.

On the other hand, if a feature-rich, familiar user interface with extensive compatibility is more your speed, ARC would be a strong contender.

ARC offers features and excellent compatibility with various web technologies and apps built on Chromium.

No matter which you choose, both Orion and ARC each offer unique perspectives on what browsing the internet can be, emphasizing different aspects according to their design philosophies.


Orion Browser Vs. Safari Browser [Comparision of 7 Features]

Web browsers are our gateway to the vast expanse of the internet, and choosing the right one can significantly enhance our online experience.

Today, we are comparing two noteworthy contenders: the Orion and Safari browsers.

Often hailed as a fast and efficient browser focused on privacy, Orion has been steadily gaining attention in the browser marketplace.

On the other side, we have Safari, the default browser for Apple devices. It is well-integrated into the Apple ecosystem and is renowned for its speed and power efficiency, especially on mobile devices.

Here’s a fun fact: Safari was the first browser to introduce a ‘private browsing‘ feature, which has become a standard in all major browsers.

These two browsers have unique strengths, leading us to the question, “Is Orion better than Safari?

To answer that, we will compare the two across various important aspects, such as performance, security, user interface, compatibility, features, device and service integration, and update frequency.

And if you've previously considered how Orion fares against other competitors, our reviews on 'Orion Browser vs Brave Browser' and 'Orion Browser vs Chrome Browser' might interest you.

Orion Web Browser vs. Safari Web Browser

Here is the comparison of seven (7) features between the two web browsers;

1. Performance Comparison

When comparing the performance of Orion and Safari browsers, we will evaluate them based on their speed and efficiency, system resource usage, and impact on battery life on mobile devices.

Speed and Efficiency

The speed at which web pages load is critical for any user. Orion, built on the Chromium platform like Chrome, boasts speedy page loads that rival other popular browsers.

It is efficient, allowing for a seamless browsing experience even with multiple tabs open.

On the other hand, Safari, known for its optimization with Apple’s hardware, also delivers rapid page loads, particularly on Apple devices.

The efficiency is further amplified when used within Apple’s ecosystem, making it a tough competitor in speed and efficiency.

System Resource Usage

For users with less powerful devices or those who multitask heavily, system resource usage can significantly affect their browsing experience.

While Orion prides itself on being lightweight and using fewer resources than other browsers, Safari is also known for its minimal impact on system resources, particularly MacOS, making both browsers a good choice for resource-conscious users.

Battery Life on Mobile Devices

Battery life is a significant concern when using mobile devices like smartphones and tablets. Safari is highly optimized for iOS devices, providing excellent battery life when browsing.

Orion also takes measures to be energy efficient, though exact results can vary based on your specific device and usage.

For more detailed insights into Orion’s performance, check out our comprehensive ‘Review: Orion Web Browser.’

In conclusion, both Orion and Safari have their strengths when it comes to performance.

While Orion impresses with its speed and low system resource usage, Safari optimizes with Apple devices, particularly in speed and battery life.

2. Security Analysis

One of the most critical considerations for users when selecting a browser is security. Let’s look at how Orion and Safari fare in this regard.

User Data and Privacy Policies

Both Orion and Safari prioritize user privacy. Orion’s privacy features are impressive, with strong policies for handling user data.

It does not track users or sell their data, a feature you can learn more about in our ‘Orion Browser Privacy‘ post.

Safari also has robust privacy measures. It uses machine learning to identify trackers and segregates the cross-site tracking data, ensuring users’ privacy is respected.

Features for Protecting User Information

Orion offers various privacy features, such as tracker blocking and an incognito mode that does not store browsing history, cookies, or cache.

Safari offers similar privacy features, including an intelligent tracking prevention tool that helps protect user information.

Ad Blocking Capabilities

Ad blocking is another important aspect of privacy.

While Safari has built-in features that block pop-up windows and limit the tracking data advertisers collect, Orion provides a native ad-blocking feature that promises a cleaner browsing experience without invasive ads.

Phishing and Malware Protection

Both Orion and Safari provide safeguards against harmful websites. Orion’s security features surround Chromium, including safe browsing, sandboxing, and site isolation.

Safari also offers protection from harmful sites, with features like fraudulent website warnings and protections against harmful extensions.


Sandboxing is a security technique that isolates browser processes, providing an additional layer of security.

Through its Chromium base, Orion and Safari support sandboxing, contributing to a safer browsing experience.

So, to answer the question, “Is the Orion browser legit?”

Yes, it is. Orion and Safari provide strong security features that protect user data and privacy, offering a secure browsing experience.

3. User Interface Evaluation

The user interface (UI) is another crucial factor when choosing a browser, as it significantly impacts the user experience.

Intuitiveness and User-friendliness

Orion sports a clean and minimalistic design that ensures ease of use. The intuitive interface makes it easy for users to find and use features, contributing to a user-friendly experience.

The Orion browser also offers features such as tab isolation that prevents a single tab crash from bringing down the entire browser. This simple yet effective feature enhances the user experience.

In comparison, Safari offers an elegant and streamlined interface that Apple users find familiar and comfortable. It provides an efficient browsing experience with easy-to-use features and controls.

The browser offers tab previews, allowing users to glimpse a webpage by hovering over a tab – a feature that enhances usability, particularly when many open tabs.


Regarding customizability, Orion stands out with its range of themes and extensions, allowing users to tailor the browsing experience to their preferences.

The ability to customize toolbars and controls further enhances the user experience.

On the other hand, Safari offers fewer customization options compared to Orion.

However, the options it does provide are focused on delivering a consistent and streamlined user experience, including customizable start pages and a flexible toolbar.

Both Orion and Safari offer intuitive and user-friendly interfaces. While Orion provides greater customization, Safari focuses on delivering a streamlined and efficient user experience.

4. Compatibility Review

Browser compatibility can greatly impact user experience. Here, we’ll evaluate Orion and Safari based on website compatibility and compatibility with web applications.

Website Compatibility

Built on the Chromium platform, Orion maintains excellent compatibility with most websites, including newer, more dynamic websites that use the latest web technologies.

This wide-ranging compatibility ensures a smooth browsing experience.

On the other hand, Safari also maintains good compatibility with most websites.

However, as it uses a different rendering engine (WebKit), it may occasionally encounter compatibility issues with websites optimized for Chromium-based browsers. However, these cases are increasingly rare.

Compatibility with Web Applications

Web applications are an integral part of our online activities. Leveraging its Chromium base, Orion ensures high compatibility with various web apps.

This broad compatibility includes Google Suite applications and others, making Orion a solid choice for productivity.

Safari also provides robust compatibility with web applications, particularly those within Apple’s ecosystem.

This seamless integration with Apple’s suite of apps and services can be a significant advantage for Apple users.

Both Orion and Safari demonstrate good compatibility with websites and web applications, with Orion benefitting from its Chromium foundation and Safari leveraging its integration with Apple’s ecosystem.

5. Feature Examination

Browsers often differentiate themselves through unique features. Let’s look at some features that set Orion and Safari apart.

Unique Features of Orion Browser

Orion comes packed with features designed for efficiency and privacy. One of its key features is the native ad-blocker which helps provide a cleaner browsing experience.

Additionally, Orion supports a wide range of extensions from the Chromium ecosystem, expanding its feature set further.

The browser also has a feature called ‘Floating Video,’ allowing users to pop out and watch videos in a separate, resizable window while they continue to browse.

This feature is particularly useful for multitasking.

Unique Features of Safari Browser

Safari is known for its seamless integration with Apple’s ecosystem. It provides features like iCloud Tabs, allowing users to switch between devices while seamlessly keeping their browsing sessions intact.

Another standout feature of Safari is ‘Reading List,’ which lets users save web pages for later reading, even offline.

Additionally, Safari’s ‘Reader Mode’ is excellent, stripping out unnecessary content and ads to present a clean, readable version of web pages.

Both Orion and Safari have unique features that cater to different user preferences. Orion stands out with features aimed at multitasking and user privacy.

At the same time, Safari’s strengths lie in its seamless integration with Apple’s ecosystem and user-friendly additions like ‘Reading List’ and ‘Reader Mode.’

6. Integration with Other Devices and Services

Integration with devices and services significantly influences the overall user experience of a browser. Let’s see how Orion and Safari fare in this aspect.

Orion’s Device and Service Integration

Orion’s compatibility extends beyond web pages and applications. It supports syncing across multiple devices, allowing users to switch between devices while seamlessly maintaining browsing sessions.

Orion also supports a wide range of extensions and plugins from the Chromium ecosystem, enabling users to add more functionalities per their needs.

Safari’s Device and Service Integration

Safari excels in device and service integration as part of the Apple ecosystem. Users can easily sync browsing history, bookmarks, tabs, and more across all their Apple devices through iCloud.

This seamless integration also extends to Apple services, providing a unified user experience. For instance, Safari works flawlessly with Apple Pay, allowing users to make secure and private online payments.

While Orion provides good device syncing and compatibility with a wide range of extensions, Safari’s integration within the Apple ecosystem is hard to beat, providing a seamless and unified browsing experience across devices and services.

7. Update and Development Comparison

The frequency of updates and adoption of new web technologies and standards are important factors in a browser’s ongoing performance and security.

Frequency of Updates

Being based on Chromium, Orion benefits from the frequent updates and improvements made to the Chromium project.

This includes performance and security enhancements, new features, and better standards support.

Similarly, Safari follows a regular update schedule, usually coinciding with updates to macOS and iOS. These updates often improve performance, security, and occasionally, new features.

Adoption of New Web Technologies and Standards

Given its Chromium base, Orion is quick to adopt new web technologies and standards, ensuring its users can make the most out of the latest advancements on the web.

Safari, managed by Apple, is also keen on adopting new web technologies, although at a pace dictated by its own development cycle.

It’s important to note that Safari was one of the pioneers in adopting HTML5 and continues to play a leading role in supporting new web standards.

Both Orion and Safari have a robust update and development cycle, ensuring they remain secure, efficient, and up-to-date with the latest web technologies.

Both are strong contenders in this respect, with Orion benefitting from the vast Chromium project and Safari from Apple’s dedicated development efforts.

For more insights into the advantages and disadvantages of the Chromium platform, you might want to read our article on ‘Chromium: Advantages and Disadvantages.’

Conclusion and Final Thoughts

In the world of web browsers, both Orion and Safari make compelling cases. Throughout our comparison, we have seen that both have their strengths.

With its speed, efficiency, and privacy-focused features, Orion is a great option for users who prioritize these aspects.

Its compatibility with a wide range of webpages and applications, thanks to its Chromium base, ensures a smooth browsing experience.

Frequent updates also mean it stays up-to-date with the latest web standards and technologies.

On the other hand, with its robust performance and seamless integration with the Apple ecosystem, Safari offers a unified and smooth browsing experience, especially for users already within this ecosystem.

Its regular updates and a dedicated focus on user privacy and security ensure that Safari remains a solid choice.

Ultimately, the choice between Orion and Safari may boil down to individual user preferences and their specific needs.

We hope this comparison has helped shed some light on these two browsers’ unique features and capabilities and will aid you in making an informed decision.


Orion browser vs. Brave browser [Comparison of 7 Features]

Today, we’re going to delve into an electrifying showdown: Orion browser vs. Brave browser. Grab your popcorn and buckle up, because this is going to be a thrilling ride.

Is Orion a good browser? Could it be better than Brave? Well, you’re about to find out!

We’ve previously dug deep into the world of Orion in our Orion web browser review, but today we’re putting it head-to-head with Brave.

Ready to see how these browsers stack up? Let’s get started!

Fun fact: Did you know the world's first web browser was called "WorldWideWeb"? Yup, it was developed in 1990 by Sir Tim Berners-Lee. Simple name, massive impact!

Comparison Between the Orion web browser and the Brave web browser

Here are the seven (7) features compared;

Round 1: Speed

In today’s fast-paced world, ain’t nobody got time for a slow browser, right? That’s why we’re kicking things off with the speed round.

Imagine you’re at a drag race. On one side, you’ve got the Orion browser, known to be as swift as a cheetah on a caffeine rush.

It’s designed to make your browsing experience as seamless as slicing through soft butter. Whether you’re streaming your favorite show or looking up a quick recipe, Orion promises to keep things zippy.

On the other side, we’ve got the Brave browser, which has earned quite a reputation for speed itself. It’s like that reliable old car that’s had a turbo engine fitted in.

Thanks to its aggressive ad-blocking, Brave doesn’t just eliminate pesky distractions and clears the way for a faster ride through the information highway.

Round 2: Privacy

In the age of digital living, privacy has become as precious as gold. Or maybe even more so. It’s like our own little secret garden in the vast, open fields of the internet. We want to keep it safe, right?

Enter our competitors: Orion browser and Brave browser, each with their own approaches to privacy. So, who’s the guardian angel of your online privacy?

Orion steps into the arena with its state-of-the-art privacy features. It’s like a stealthy ninja in the night, ensuring your browsing activities stay under the radar.

Want to dive deeper into how Orion maintains your privacy? Check out our detailed take on Orion browser’s privacy.

And in the other corner, we’ve got Brave, that good old watchdog that snarls at the very whiff of trackers and third-party cookies. It’s like a vault for your browsing, letting you browse with peace of mind.

Round 3: User Experience

User experience is like being at a party. You want to feel comfortable, have everything you need within reach, and have a good time, right? That’s exactly what a browser should offer you.

Here’s how our contestants measure up.

Orion Browser is like that friendly host who’s always there to make sure you’re having a good time. Its interface is as simple and clean as a freshly made bed: no unnecessary clutter, just you and your browsing.

On the other hand, Brave Browser feels like a well-organized library. Everything is where you expect it to be. It’s easy on the eyes and doesn’t immediately overwhelm you with a hundred different options.

Round 4: Features

Features in a browser are like toppings on a pizza – the more, the merrier, but they gotta be the right ones to make the whole thing taste great!

Now, what makes Orion Browser unique is its adaptability. It’s got a great mix of toppings – from a built-in VPN to an ad-blocker. It’s like that deluxe pizza that’s got all your favorite stuff on it.

Plus, it’s always up for adding new features, almost like asking you, “What topping would you like next?”

Brave Browser, on the other hand, comes fully loaded with its signature topping – privacy features. It’s got shields up against pesky ads and trackers, making your browsing experience as clean as a whistle.

Round 5: Resource Usage

Now, you don’t want your browser to be that one roommate who’s always hogging all the resources, do you? A browser should be like a well-trained pet, knowing when to take and when to give back.

Here’s the scoop on our contenders:

Orion Browser is like that courteous roommate who always cleans up after themselves. It’s designed to be light on your system, ensuring that your computer doesn’t have to break a sweat. It’s all about that balance, baby!

In contrast, Brave Browser is like a low-key minimalist, thanks to its ad-blocking prowess. By cutting down on unnecessary ads, it eases the load on your system resources, giving you a smooth browsing experience.

Round 6: Community and Support

In the tech world, having a solid community and support system is like having a 24/7 tech hotline. Something goes wrong, and boom, you’ve got a whole community ready to lend a helping hand.

Here’s the rundown on Orion Browser and Brave Browser:

With Orion, you have a growing community of avid supporters. They’re like the friendly neighbors always ready to help you out when your WiFi goes down.

And as for official support, Orion’s team works round the clock to squash bugs and answer your queries.

Brave, on the other hand, has a strong, established community. Imagine having a huge family of tech enthusiasts, ready to pitch in at a moment’s notice.

Plus, with a solid reputation, Brave’s official support has proven to be reliable and responsive.

Round 7: Security

When it comes to the digital world, security is like the superhero that keeps us safe from all the villains lurking in the shadows.

And in our case, Orion and Brave are the superheroes of the day. So, who’s got the mightier shield?

Orion Browser swoops in with a strong commitment to security. It’s constantly being updated to patch any potential security threats.

It’s like having a personal bodyguard always on alert, ensuring your browsing journey is safe.

Stepping up to the challenge, Brave Browser holds up its robust security features. Its shields aren’t just for privacy but also fend off malware and phishing attempts.

It’s like living in a house with top-notch security systems, keeping all the digital baddies at bay.


Whew, what a ride! We’ve gone from speed to privacy, from user experience to features, from resource usage to community support, and finally landed on security.

We’ve seen the strengths of Orion Browser and the might of Brave Browser. But, the big question remains: Is Orion better than Brave?

Well, folks, the truth is, there’s no definitive answer to that. It’s all about what you need. If you’re all about speed and a modern interface, Orion could be your go-to.

If privacy and established community support float your boat, Brave might be the one for you.

At the end of the day, both Orion and Brave offer great options for the modern web user. They both have their own charms and strengths.

So, give ’em a whirl and see which one feels like home to you. And remember, whichever browser you choose, happy browsing!


21 Pros and Cons of Using Google Slides [Comparing Features]

Ah, Google Slides. You’ve probably heard of it or even used it at some point, but have you ever stopped to think about the pros and cons of using Google Slides?

Well, you’re in luck because today, we’re diving into all the good, the bad, and the “meh” of Google’s popular presentation tool.

This nifty tool, part of the Google Workspace, comes with a whole lot of upsides, but just like any other technology, it has its downsides too.

By the end of this blog post, you’ll be able to answer the question confidently, “Is Google Slides any good?“.

Whether you’re a student, a teacher, a business professional, or someone who just likes to stay in the know, this one’s for you.

Fun fact #1: Did you know that Google Slides was originally launched as a part of Google Labs in 2007? It's been helping us make slick presentations for over 15 years!

What is Google Slides?

Google Slides is a free, web-based presentation program, kind of like the cooler, younger sibling to Microsoft’s PowerPoint.

It’s part of the Google Workspace, which includes other handy tools like Google Docs and Google Sheets.

Google Slides allows you to create, edit, and share presentations directly through your web browser; no software downloads are necessary.

It’s all about simplicity, collaboration, and letting your creativity shine.

Fun fact #2: In 2012, Google Slides got a big boost in popularity when it became available as a standalone app on the Chrome Web Store.

Pros of Using Google Slides

Now, if Google Slides were a superhero, what would its superpowers be?

1. Accessibility and Collaboration

Google Slides is like that one friend who’s always there when you need them. Accessible from any device with an internet connection, you can work on your presentations from your laptop, tablet, or even your phone!

And the collaboration feature? It’s like hosting a virtual brainstorming session. Multiple people can work on a presentation at the same time, making it a dream for group projects or team meetings.

2. Integration with Google Ecosystem

Imagine if your smartphone could talk to your fridge and chat with your home security system. That’s basically how Google Slides fits into the Google Ecosystem.

It’s seamlessly integrated with other Google Workspace tools like Google Docs and Google Drive. You can even play your presentations on Google Meet!

3. Easy to Use

Google Slides is like a friendly neighborhood librarian – it’s here to help and won’t confuse you with tech jargon. Its interface is intuitive; you don’t need to be a tech whiz to create a beautiful presentation.

For more insights on how Google Drive can help you out, especially for students, take a peek at our post on how Google Drive helps students.

4. Constant Updates and Improvement

Google Slides is like that person at the gym who never misses a day, constantly working out to get stronger and better.

Google frequently updates Slides with new features and improvements, ensuring you have the best tools to create your masterpiece.

5. Cloud-Based

With Google Slides, your presentations are stored in the cloud, not on your device. Think of it as having a magical backpack that can store infinite presentations without weighing you down.

Plus, you don’t have to worry about losing your work if your computer crashes.

6. Free to Use

If Google Slides were a restaurant, it’d be one of those amazing places that serve up gourmet meals, totally on the house.

That’s right; Google Slides is completely free to use. All you need is a Google account, and you’re good to go!

7. Variety of Templates

Feeling a little uninspired? Google Slides has got your back with a variety of templates. It’s like having a personal stylist for your presentation, helping you look your best without the stress.

8. Offline Access

Ever been in a situation where the internet connection bails on you like a flaky friend? Google Slides won’t leave you hanging.

With offline access, you can work on your presentations even when you’re not connected to the internet. It’s like having a flashlight during a power outage!

9. Export Options

Google Slides is like a multilingual genius, speaking a multitude of file formats. You can export your presentations in formats like PPTX, PDF, TXT, JPEG, PNG, and SVG.

Handy, right? For more on file compatibility, check out our piece on Google Drive supported video formats.

10. Add-ons

Think of add-ons as the secret sauce that can take your presentation from good to mind-blowing. Google Slides supports a variety of add-ons, letting you personalize your slides and incorporate unique features.

Cons of Using Google Slides

Remember, it’s all about finding the right tool for your needs, and that means understanding the not-so-great parts too.

11. Limited Features Compared to Some Competitors

If Google Slides were a restaurant, it might not have as diverse a menu as some of its competitors. While it does many great things, it doesn’t offer as many features or complexity as tools like PowerPoint.

12. Reliance on Internet Connection

While Google Slides does offer offline editing, you’ll need an internet connection for the initial setup and to access all the features.

It’s a bit like having a car that mostly runs on electricity but needs a little gas occasionally.

13. Limited Customization

Google Slides is like a pair of off-the-rack jeans. Sure, they fit well enough, but they might not have that perfect, tailored fit that some people want.

While there’s plenty of customization available, it doesn’t quite measure up to some other presentation tools.

14. File Compatibility Issues

Google Slides might sometimes act like that one person at the party who can’t get the dance moves right.

There might be some formatting issues when importing presentations from other software like PowerPoint. It’s not a deal-breaker, but it can be a bit frustrating.

15. No Advanced Video and Audio Editing

If you want to create a presentation with advanced multimedia, Google Slides might leave you feeling like a chef without all the ingredients. You can embed videos and audio, but the editing features are quite basic.

Curious about what video formats Google Drive can handle? We’ve got you covered with our guide on can Google Drive play MOV files.

16. Limited Tech Support

When you need help, Google Slides might not always be as responsive as you’d like. It’s like calling a friend for advice and getting their voicemail.

There’s some tech support available, but it’s not as comprehensive as some other platforms.

17. Privacy and Security Concerns

Now, Google Slides is like a vault when it comes to your data, but some folks might still feel a little uneasy about storing their information in the cloud.

After all, nobody wants their secret salsa recipe getting out.

18. Performance Issues

Sometimes, Google Slides might act a bit like an old car that sputters on a cold morning. When working with large presentations, you may experience some lag or performance issues.

19. Limited Font Choices

If you’re a font fanatic, Google Slides might not completely satisfy your cravings. It’s like going to an ice cream shop and finding they only have basic flavors.

Sure, there’s a decent selection, but it’s not as extensive as some other platforms.

20. Not Ideal for Complex Presentations

Imagine trying to bake a five-tier wedding cake in a toaster oven. Sometimes, Google Slides might not be the best tool for extremely complex presentations.

It’s fantastic for most tasks, but you might need to look elsewhere for intricate animations or advanced multimedia.

21. Collaboration Challenges

While Google Slides is usually the life of the collaboration party, there can be too much of a good thing.

If you have too many people working on a presentation at once, it can get a bit chaotic. It’s like trying to converse with ten people at once!


We’ve journeyed through the ins and outs, the ups and downs, and the twists and turns of Google Slides.

We’ve looked at everything from its impressive collaboration features, like a well-choreographed dance troupe, to its occasional stumbles, like a cat trying to look cool after sliding off a countertop.

But the big question is, “What are the benefits and the disadvantages of using Google Slides?” Well, it really depends on what you need.

It’s like choosing between a bike and a car. Both can get you where you’re going, but each has its strengths and weaknesses.

If you’re looking for an easy-to-use, free tool that shines in collaboration and accessibility, Google Slides is a fantastic choice.

It has a decent set of features and is constantly improving, just like a well-loved recipe that improves with each tweak.

But you might find Google Slides a bit limiting if you need advanced features, complex multimedia, or extensive customization.

It’s a bit like trying to make a gourmet meal with basic kitchen equipment. Sure, you can do it, but it might not be the easiest or most efficient way.

So, are Google Slides any good? Absolutely! Is it perfect? Well, nothing is. But it’s a tool worth considering as part of the Google ecosystem.

To learn more about how Google tools can benefit you, check out our posts on the benefits of Google Apps for Education and the pros and cons of using Google Drive.


7 Differences Between Google Docs and Google Drive [Explained]

Ever found yourself in a pickle, asking, “Is Google Drive also Google Docs?” or “Should I use Google Drive or Google Docs?

Well, my friend, you’re in the right place. Today, we will break down these two digital giants, helping you navigate the maze of Google’s online tools.

Google Drive and Google Docs may seem like two peas in a pod, but trust me; they’re as different as apples and oranges. Intriguing, huh?

So, buckle up, and let’s dig into the 7 key differences between Google Drive and Google Docs.

Fun Fact #1: Did you know that Google Drive was released in April 2012, a whopping six years after Google Docs was introduced in 2006? The more you know, right?

Google Docs vs. Google Drive: The Basics

Before we dive deep into the differences, let’s get the lay of the land. In a nutshell, Google Drive is your personal cloud storage service, like a virtual locker for all your digital files.

It’s got your back, storing everything from photos to videos and even those cherished cat memes.

On the flip side, Google Docs is an online word processor, the place where you craft your next masterpiece or collaborate on that all-important work project. It’s the digital canvas where you let your creativity run wild.

Here’s a nifty analogy: Google Drive is like a big ol’ storage unit, while Google Docs is the cozy corner where you sit down to create and edit your documents.

Fun Fact #2: Google Docs supports offline editing. So if you're stuck in the middle of nowhere without the internet, you can still work on your files. Cool, huh?

What Are The Differences Between Google Docs and Google Drive

Here are the seven (7) differences between the two.

Difference #1: Purpose

First up, let’s talk about the reason these tools exist. Google Drive is your go-to digital storage unit, making sure all your files are safe, sound, and easy to access.

Its primary purpose is to store, sync, and share files across multiple devices. And if you’re wondering, “How do I use Google Docs in Google Drive?” well, that’s exactly where our other contender comes into play.

Google Docs, on the other hand, is all about helping you create, edit, and collaborate on text documents in real time. It’s like your favorite word processor on steroids!

Instead of being restricted to your computer, Google Docs lets you work from anywhere, with anyone, and on any device.

Difference #2: Functionality

Next up, let’s talk about what these two powerhouses can do. Google Drive is a multitasker’s dream! It can store all sorts of files, from your vacation photos to important work documents.

It’s also a champ at sharing and syncing files across different devices. Want to know more about how Google Drive can be a boon to students? Check out this handy-dandy guide on how Google Drive can help students.

Now, Google Docs is a bit more specialized. It’s your trusty word processor, ensuring you can easily create and edit text documents.

It’s got some nifty features like real-time editing, commenting, and easy sharing that make it a hot favorite for team projects.

Difference #3: File Type and Format

Now we’re moving on to the types of files these two can handle. Google Drive is like the Swiss Army Knife of digital storage. It supports a wide array of file types and formats, from PDFs and JPEGs to MP4s and even MOV files.

Oh, and speaking of which, if you’ve ever wondered, “Can Google Drive play MOV files,” you’re in luck because we’ve got the answers!

Google Docs, on the other hand, is focused on text documents. It lets you create and edit .docx and .odt files and even save your work as PDF or ePUB. It’s more like a master chef specializing in one type of cuisine.

Difference #4: Collaboration Features

Now let’s talk about teamwork, shall we? Both Google Drive and Google Docs have features that make it easy to collaborate with others, but they each have their own unique spin on it.

Google Drive allows you to share entire folders or individual files with others, letting them view, edit, or comment as needed. It’s like throwing a digital party and inviting your friends to join in.

Google Docs, on the other hand, takes collaboration to a whole new level. You can have multiple people editing a document at the same time, see their changes in real-time, and even chat with them right in the document.

It’s like having a team meeting, brainstorming session, and work party all rolled into one.

Difference #5: Storage Capabilities

Alright, let’s talk storage space! Google Drive is the heavyweight champion when it comes to storing files.

With a basic free account, you get a generous 15GB of storage across all your Google services, like Google Photos, Gmail, and Google Drive.

Now, Google Docs is a different story. While your text documents do count towards your Google Drive storage quota, they usually don’t take up much space.

Plus, Google Docs’ native files (i.e., documents created within the app) don’t count toward your storage limit at all. Score!

Want to know more about the pros and cons of Google Drive? Check out this in-depth analysis of the pros and cons of using Google Drive.

Difference #6: Accessibility

Moving on, let’s chat about accessibility. Google Drive is your reliable companion, providing access to your files and folders from any device with an internet connection.

You could be lounging on a beach in Hawaii or stuck in a snowstorm in Alaska; if you’ve got internet, you’ve got access to your Google Drive.

Google Docs is no slouch in the accessibility department either. You can access your documents from any device, anytime.

Google Docs also allows offline access, so you can work on your documents even when you’re off the grid. All you need to do is enable offline editing, and you’re good to go!

Difference #7: Security Measures

Finally, let’s talk security. Both Google Drive and Google Docs take your digital safety seriously, but they have slightly different approaches.

Google Drive focuses on securing your stored files. You can control who sees your files and what they can do with them.

Plus, it uses encryption to keep your files safe during transfer and storage. It’s like having a virtual security guard for your digital belongings.

Google Docs, on the other hand, has robust sharing permissions to control who can access and edit your documents.

It also maintains a version history, so you can track changes and revert to a previous version if needed. It’s like having a time machine for your documents!

To wrap it up: Google Drive is all about securing your stored files, while Google Docs focuses on secure collaboration and version control.

Fun Fact #3: Did you know that Google maintains a detailed audit log for Google Docs? This lets you see who made changes to a document and when those changes were made!


And there you have it, folks! We’ve just taken a scenic tour of the key differences between Google Drive and Google Docs.

From their core purpose, functionality, and file handling to their unique collaboration features, storage capabilities, accessibility, and security measures, we’ve covered it all.

Just remember, while they might seem similar on the surface, Google Drive and Google Docs are as different as night and day.

One’s your trusty storage locker, the other your creative workshop. Together, they make for a powerful team, helping you work smarter, not harder.

7 Key Considerations: Send Resume CV in PDF or Word format

Applying for a job requires sending your resume or curriculum vitae (CV) to the employer or job agency. Usually, you can choose between sending a Word document or a PDF format. There are various professional reasons and considerations for choosing the best and safest choice, given your circumstances.

Technically speaking, the two (2) widely-accepted file formats are;

  • Microsoft Word document (.doc or .docx) format
  • Portable Document Format (.pdf) format

This article will explain all the considerations you should take before sending your resume and CV.

Also, always remove the Word/PDF metadata before sending it to external parties, as they may contain unnecessary or embarrassing details, such as author, comments, revision, file creation timestamp, etc.

Related Post: How to Remove Metadata from Word and PDF documents

What is the Best File Format to Send Your Job Resume, Word or PDF?

Here are the seven (7) key considerations for deciding on which format you should send for your job resume and CV.

1. Does the company prefer a specific format?


Sometimes in the job description, the company will specifically ask for a particular file format for applicants to send over.

For example, on LinkedIn, applicants sending resumes on the platform generally prefer PDF formats due to the impression of looking more professional.

In short, be sure to use the file format as specified in the job description.

2. Do you want to prevent editing?


Having your resume or CV in Word format allows for useful features like adding comments and taking side notes.

If the company or yourself prefer the editing features of using Word format, use it.

To prevent editing to your resume or CV, you want to preserve its formatting, margins, fonts, and images, among other elements. In addition, you do not wish to have a resizing issue when opening your resume or CV in different screen sizes and using different devices.

3. How big is the file size of your resume?


You may want to look at your resume or CV file size, especially when you are supposed to send the document over email or upload it to some job portal, where you don’t want to exceed the maximum upload file size.

Converting from Word to PDF will always increase its file size significantly.

Take note of the file size and if you can send your resume or CV over.

4. Do you want to allow for keyword searching?


Having a Word format document, one can easily search using the standard Windows environment without installing thirty-party software.

It can be helpful for a company to search for a particular candidate or keyword across all the submitted resumes or CVs.

PDFs, for example, can still be searchable by other software. However, the accuracy is not as good as having a Word document. Optical Character Recognition (OCR) addon is required for software tools that search through PDF files, and it is not always 100% accurate.

5. What industry and sector are you applying for?


Does a well-formatted and image-intensive resume or CV help you have a competitive edge over the other applicants?

For resumes that require illustrations and are generally lengthy, it is best to have them in a PDF format.

You want to preserve nice formatting for your images and graphics.

Maybe you are applying for a role in Adobe; you can consider using PDF format. On the other hand, if you are applying for Microsoft, you can view sending a Word document format if you have the flexibility to choose.

6. Does the company use an ATS system?


An Applicant Tracking System (ATS) is a human resource software system that takes in applicants’ resumes, CVs, cover letters, references and many more relating to the desired job role they are applying for.

You should read the job description and the company’s website to determine if they have stated they are using an ATS system.

Choose Word format, as it has the highest readability in ATS systems.

Some older ATS systems do not support PDF formats, although this situation is rare these days. Therefore to be on the safer side, go for the Word format.

7. Are you using a paid resume template?


When you pay for a professional-looking and eye-catching resume or CV, you do not want to distribute them for free over the Internet.

These paid resumes can go as high as USD 60, depending on the quality and uniqueness of the resume.

Some of the sites you can get a professional-looking resume template are;


If the company does not specify a particular file format in their job description, you can have the flexibility to choose between a Word document or a PDF document.

Generally speaking, go for Word document format in everyday situations because you want the company to edit, insert comments, take notes and perform keyword searching inside your Word document.

Remember not to make your Word format read-only or password-protected. Doing so will appear unprofessional and as an unnecessary security restriction.

Go for the PDF format if your resume is lengthy and images need to be well-formatted, preserved and displayed for the interviewer.

You can always use an online resume builder like Canva and MyPerfectResume.

Lastly, remember to remove the metadata from your resume and CV before sending.


Data Recovery vs Digital Forensics: 7 Differences Explained

Within digital forensics tools, a certain amount of data recovery features are built into them. However, it cannot contain every data recovery capability, and digital forensics is not the same as data recovery.

So how do you choose Digital Forensics over Data Recovery?

This article will cover all the differences and intended uses for each method.

What is the difference between Digital Forensics and Data Recovery?

Here are the seven (7) key differences between them.

1. Admissibility in a Court of Law

This is probably the most important difference between the two.

When you use digital forensics methodology and tools to extract data from electronic devices, the data can become useful digital evidence for criminal investigation cases and even corporate crime investigations, e.g. checks into employee misconduct, data leaks, etc.

If you want to introduce digital evidence in court, use digital forensics methodology and tools.

For data recovery, this is used frequently by those who really need to find back lost files, e.g. old photo memories. In-depth file reconstruction can be performed and requires time to restore back.

If you want to recover important files that have been deleted, overwritten or lost, use the data recovery method.

2. Changes to the Data / Files

In terms of their content and metadata, file changes when they get copied, opened, printed or edited.

Digital forensics preserves the integrity of the data extracted from the device. This means all the files in the device are intact, and there is no contamination made to these files. Therefore, no changes, including metadata changes, are introduced.

Files remain the same as the last time it was used.

Data recovery will make changes to the files since they had to be copied and data craved to uncover previously deleted content or versions.

The act of data carving will also overwrite certain portions of the disk space, thus making changes to the disk-allocated or unallocated space.

3. Angle of Focus

In digital forensics, one tends to be more interested in system & app artefacts such as the computer’s login date/time, the list of websites one visits, the last edit date of the document, and the timeline of all events on the device, etc. These findings can incriminate vs exculpate someone.

In data recovery, one will be more interested in recovering deleted, overwritten, hidden and lost files. Often, the technique of data carving will be used to “carve” out the lost file from the disk partition. However, this process usually takes a long time and can take a few days, depending on the storage capacity and size of the hard drive.

4. Methodology used

This refers to the difference in steps and processes involved in achieving the output.

The methodology used in digital forensics involves the four (4) steps shown in the table below.

StepsDigital Forensic Stage/sComments
1CollectionThe proper seizure procedure of devices to prevent physical damage and file contamination
2PreservationThe forensic process of acquiring (imaging) a forensic image of the device
3AnalysisThe examination stage to uncover any inculpatory or exculpatory digital evidence using digital forensic tools
4PresentationExplaining the forensic findings, typically presented in a court of law when used by law enforcement agencies

For data recovery, there are four (4) phases, namely;

  • Phase 1: Repairing the hard drive
  • Phase 2: Imaging the hard drive
  • Phase 3: Logical recovery of the files, partitions, Master Boot Record and filesystem structures
  • Phase 4: Repair damaged files

5. Hardware & Software Tools used

There are differences in both the hardware and software used.

Digital forensics uses physical write-blockers to ensure the imaging of the data is always in read-only mode. This prevents any accidental writing to the device. The software used is different as well.

The software used is also different. For example, mobile forensics uses software like Cellebrite UFED and Oxygen Forensic tools, while cloud forensics uses software like Magnet AXIOM.

Data recovery uses hard drive diagnosis equipment to check disk health and attempt disk repair. Examples of software tools used are; Recuva for Android devices, Dr Fone for iOS devices and PhotoRec for mass storage devices like memory cards and USB flash drives.

6. Specialized Learning & Courses

In digital forensics, you need to learn how to use commercial forensics tools, either through employment or open-source forensics tools like Autopsy or SIFT Workstation.

Besides learning about file systems (e.g. NTFS, FAT, Android) and operating systems (e.g. macOS, Windows), you can expect to get hands-on on dismantling computer parts, especially taking out hard drives from laptops.

For data recovery, you need to learn the internal mechanisms of hard disk operations and the newer solid-state drives (SSDs). You can expect some hands-on in dismantling computer parts as well.

7. Seeking Professional Help

Although digital forensics is mainly a law enforcement capability for criminal offences, there are more and more private sector companies performing digital forensics for the public. Digital evidence can now be used in civil cases, matrimony cases, etc.

You can easily look for a digital forensics company online. In addition, the big four (4) accounting firms also have their own in-house digital forensics team.

Data recovery companies, on the other hand, are plenty to choose from. Choose someone who can differentiate between digital forensics and data recovery and be honest in their pricing and waiting time.

If your hard drive is spoilt and undetectable, expect to pay a higher price due to disk repair procedures.


Can digital forensics recover deleted, overwritten and lost files?

Using digital forensics tools, there are some data recovery features in it.

Depending on the seriousness of overwritten data, it is sometimes possible to reconstruct back a part of the file. For example, an image JPEG file can be partially reconstructed if certain portions of its data are intact and not overwritten.

On the other hand, this cannot apply to file types like PDF, where the whole data needs to be intact before reconstruction can happen.

Therefore, if a file is deleted but not yet overwritten by other files, there is a high chance of recovery.

Can encryption be detected using digital forensics or data recovery methods?

Encryption can be detected using digital forensics tools, such as OpenText EnCase. These encrypted files/folders will be flagged as encrypted compound files. The correct password will still be needed to unzip, mount or decrypt it.

Data recovery methods cannot detect the presence of encryption files or folders.

Can you permanently delete data so that digital forensics and data recovery methods cannot recover it back?

Yes, this is possible. Take, for instance, using a typical hard disk drive or a USB flash drive. You can use a command line or Minitool Partition Wizard to zero out your disk once.


7 Security Differences Between macOS vs. Linux [Comparision]

You might’ve wondered, Is Linux more secure than Mac? Or which operating system has the best security?

Well, you’re not alone! Security has become a top priority for individuals and organizations as technology evolves.

Today, we’ll explore the security differences between MacOS and Linux to help you better understand the pros and cons of each platform.

MacOS, developed by Apple Inc., is known for its sleek design, user-friendly interface, and seamless integration with other Apple products.

On the other hand, Linux is an open-source operating system with a large, dedicated community of developers and users.

Its flexibility and customizability make it a popular choice for servers, developers, and tech-savvy users.

1. System Architecture and Security

In general, Linux tends to be more customizable, allowing for fine-tuned security configurations.

However, this flexibility can also be a double-edged sword, as inexperienced users may inadvertently introduce security vulnerabilities.

The Unix Foundation: Similarities and Differences

Unix, known for its stability and security, provides a solid base for both MacOS and Linux. While MacOS is a certified Unix operating system, Linux is Unix-like, meaning it behaves similarly but isn’t a direct descendant of Unix.

One important aspect of Unix’s security is its file permission system, which restricts access to files and directories, helping to protect sensitive data.

The Role of Permissions and User Management

MacOS and Linux have robust user management systems that provide different access levels to system resources. This helps prevent unauthorized users from making changes or accessing sensitive data.

On MacOS, an admin account can manage other users and system settings, while Linux uses a superuser account called “root” for the same purpose.

2. Built-In Security Features

MacOS and Linux have their own set of built-in security features designed to protect your system and data.

MacOS’s Gatekeeper and XProtect

Gatekeeper is a security feature on MacOS that ensures only trusted software is installed on your device. It verifies the developer’s identity and checks for known malicious code before allowing an app to run.

XProtect, on the other hand, is a built-in anti-malware tool that scans downloaded files for known threats and automatically updates its malware definitions.

Linux’s AppArmor and SELinux

Linux has its own set of security tools. AppArmor (short for Application Armor) and SELinux (Security-Enhanced Linux) are two popular options.

AppArmor is a kernel security module that confines programs to limited resources, reducing potential damage from compromised applications.

SELinux, developed by the National Security Agency (NSA), enforces mandatory access controls and provides an additional layer of security to prevent unauthorized actions.

3. Software Updates and Patches

Keeping your operating system updated with the latest patches and security fixes is essential to maintain its security.

The Update Cycle for MacOS

Apple regularly releases software updates for MacOS, which include security patches, bug fixes, and new features.

Updates are delivered through the built-in Software Update tool, making it easy for users to keep their systems up-to-date.

Apple typically supports major MacOS versions for several years, ensuring that even older devices receive important security updates.

The Update Cycle for Linux Distributions

The update cycle for Linux varies depending on the distribution you’re using. Some distributions, like Ubuntu, have regular release cycles with Long Term Support (LTS) versions that receive updates for an extended period.

Others, like Arch Linux, use a rolling-release model, which means the system is continuously updated with the latest software packages.

4. Vulnerability to Malware and Viruses

No operating system is entirely immune to malware and viruses, but some are more vulnerable than others.

The Prevalence of Threats on MacOS

While MacOS has long been considered more secure than its Windows counterpart, it’s not invulnerable.

In recent years, the number of malware threats targeting MacOS has increased, mainly due to the growing popularity of Apple products.

However, Apple’s built-in security measures and timely software updates help mitigate these risks.

The Prevalence of Threats on Linux

Linux is often considered more secure than both Windows and MacOS, largely due to its open-source nature and smaller market share.

The open-source community can quickly identify and patch vulnerabilities, while the smaller user base makes it a less attractive target for cybercriminals.

5. Third-Party Security Solutions

While built-in security features are essential, third-party security tools can further enhance the protection of your system.

Popular Security Tools for macOS

  • Norton 360: A comprehensive security suite that offers real-time malware protection, a firewall, and a VPN.
  • Malwarebytes for Mac: A powerful anti-malware tool that scans for and removes threats from your system.
  • Intego Mac Internet Security X9: A MacOS-specific security solution that includes antivirus, firewall, and parental control features.

Popular Security Tools for Linux

  • ClamAV: An open-source antivirus engine that detects Trojans, viruses, and other malicious threats.
  • Firejail: A sandboxing tool that isolates applications from the rest of the system, reducing potential damage from compromised apps.
  • Gufw: A user-friendly firewall application that helps you manage incoming and outgoing connections.

6. Privacy Considerations

Privacy has become a major concern for many users in today’s digital age. Here’s how MacOS and Linux handle data collection and privacy.

MacOS and Data Collection

Apple has a relatively strong privacy policy and has taken steps to minimize data collection. However, some data is still collected, such as usage analytics, which can be used to improve products and services.

Users have the option to limit data sharing through privacy settings, and Apple claims not to sell user data to third parties.

Linux and Data Collection

One of the key advantages of Linux is its open-source nature, which allows users to scrutinize and modify the code.

This transparency makes it easier to trust that your privacy is being respected.

Most Linux distributions have minimal data collection practices, if any, and you can choose a distribution that aligns with your privacy preferences.

7. Community Support and Resources

Having access to a strong support network and resources can help you troubleshoot issues, stay informed about security updates, and learn more about your operating system.

The Apple Ecosystem and Support Network

Apple offers official support for macOS through various channels, including online resources, phone support, and in-person assistance at Apple Stores.

Additionally, many MacOS users share their knowledge and experiences on forums, blogs, and social media platforms.

The Open-Source Community and Linux

Linux, being an open-source project, relies heavily on its community for support and resources.

While commercial distributions like Red Hat and Ubuntu offer paid support options, many Linux users rely on forums, wikis, and mailing lists for help.

The open-source nature of Linux also means that users can contribute to projects, report bugs, and help improve the software.


When comparing the security differences between MacOS and Linux, it’s essential to consider the system architecture, built-in security features, software updates, vulnerability to malware, third-party security solutions, privacy considerations, and community support.

Both operating systems have their unique strengths and weaknesses, making the choice ultimately dependent on your needs and preferences.

MacOS offers a more polished, user-friendly experience with official support from Apple, while Linux provides unmatched flexibility and customizability with a strong open-source community.

By understanding the security aspects of each platform, you can make an informed decision and choose the operating system that best aligns with your requirements and values.

Keep in mind that no matter which operating system you choose, maintaining good security practices, such as using strong passwords, keeping software up-to-date, and being cautious with unfamiliar files and links, is crucial to keeping your system and data safe.


7 Similarities Between MacOS and Linux Operating Systems

Have you ever wondered, “Why is macOS so similar to Linux?” or “Is macOS related to Linux?

Well, you’re not alone. These two operating systems, despite having their differences, share a surprising number of similarities.

Today, we’re going to explore 9 major similarities between macOS and Linux, diving into their unique features and what makes them stand out in the world of operating systems.

What Are The Similarities Between MacOS vs. Linux

Here are the nine (9) common features they both have;

Similarity #1: UNIX-based Origins

In a nutshell, the UNIX-based origins of both macOS and Linux have led to a shared foundation and similarities in design principles, making them more alike than you might have initially thought.

Here’s where it all started: both macOS and Linux have their roots in the UNIX operating system, which was developed in the late 1960s and early 1970s at Bell Labs.

UNIX provided the foundation for many modern operating systems, and its design principles and philosophies have stood the test of time.

macOS, originally known as Mac OS X, was built on top of the UNIX-based NeXTSTEP, which was developed by NeXT, the company founded by Steve Jobs after he left Apple.

When Apple acquired NeXT in 1997, they used NeXTSTEP to create the macOS we know and love today.

On the other hand, Linux was created by Linus Torvalds in 1991 as a free and open-source alternative to UNIX.

While it isn’t a direct descendant of UNIX like macOS, Linux was heavily inspired by UNIX’s design and shares many of its concepts, like the hierarchical file system and process management.

Similarity #2: Powerful Command-Line Interfaces

Both macOS and Linux users enjoy the power and flexibility of their command-line interfaces, which provide advanced functionality and control that can’t be matched by graphical user interfaces alone.

Another striking similarity between macOS and Linux is their powerful command-line interfaces (CLIs).

Both operating systems provide users with a robust, flexible, and efficient way to interact with their computers through text-based commands.

macOS features the Terminal, an application that gives you access to the Unix shell, which is the default command-line interface for macOS.

With the Terminal, you can perform a wide range of tasks, such as file management, software installation, and system troubleshooting.

On the other hand, Linux offers various command-line interfaces known as “shells.” The most popular Linux shells include Bash (Bourne Again Shell), Zsh, and Fish.

These shells allow you to interact with your Linux system, automate tasks using scripts, and even customize your command-line experience.

Similarity #3: Robust File Systems

While macOS and Linux utilize different file systems, their focus on providing reliable, high-performance, and secure storage solutions for users is a common thread that ties them together.

File systems are essential for any operating system, as they define how data is stored, organized, and accessed on a computer.

Both macOS and Linux boast robust and advanced file systems that offer numerous benefits, such as data integrity, performance, and scalability.

macOS primarily uses the Apple File System (APFS), which was introduced in 2017. APFS is designed to provide enhanced performance, security, and reliability for Apple devices.

It supports features like encryption, space sharing, and cloning, which help make the most of your storage and safeguard your data.

In contrast, Linux offers various file systems to choose from, such as Ext4, XFS, and Btrfs. Ext4 is the most popular and widely-used Linux file system, known for its robustness, reliability, and backward compatibility.

More advanced file systems like Btrfs offer features like snapshots, data deduplication, and built-in RAID support, catering to the needs of different users and use cases.

Similarity #4: Open Source Software Support

The strong support for open-source software in both macOS and Linux gives users more freedom and flexibility and fosters a sense of community and collaboration that encourages innovation and continuous improvement.

Open source software has been gaining traction in recent years, and both macOS and Linux users can benefit from the extensive selection of open-source applications and tools available to them.

Open source software allows users to freely access, modify, and distribute the source code, fostering collaboration and innovation.

Many popular open-source applications, such as LibreOffice, GIMP, and VLC Media Player, are available on both macOS and Linux, providing powerful alternatives to proprietary software.

Additionally, both operating systems support package managers like Homebrew for macOS and apt or yum for Linux, making installing and managing open-source software easy.

Developers and power users can also take advantage of a wide range of open-source tools and libraries for programming, automation, and system administration.

Examples include Git, Python, Node.js, and Docker, which are widely used across macOS and Linux platforms.

Similarity #5: Comprehensive Developer Tools

Whether you’re a macOS developer focused on creating apps for the Apple ecosystem or a Linux developer working on open-source projects, both operating systems provide a rich and versatile development environment that caters to your needs.

Last but not least, macOS and Linux offer a wide array of comprehensive developer tools, making them popular among developers, programmers, and IT professionals.

These tools help streamline development, enabling users to create and deploy high-quality software more efficiently.

macOS comes with Xcode, Apple’s powerful and feature-rich integrated development environment (IDE) for creating macOS, iOS, iPadOS, and more applications.

Developers can also take advantage of additional tools like the LLDB debugger, Instruments for performance analysis, and the macOS SDK for leveraging native macOS features.

Linux offers a vast selection of development tools and environments, such as the widely-used GCC (GNU Compiler Collection) for compiling code, GDB (GNU Debugger) for debugging, and numerous IDEs like Eclipse, Visual Studio Code, and JetBrains’ IntelliJ IDEA.

Linux also provides extensive support for popular programming languages like Python, Ruby, and Java.

Similarity #6: Vibrant User Communities

One of the greatest strengths of both macOS and Linux is their vibrant and active user communities.

macOS users can turn to forums like MacRumors and Apple’s own support communities for help, advice, and troubleshooting.

Additionally, many websites and blogs dedicated to macOS offer tutorials, app reviews, and tips to help you get the most out of your Apple device.

Linux has a diverse and passionate community spanning various distributions, like Ubuntu, Fedora, and Arch Linux.

These communities offer forums, mailing lists, and chat rooms where users can ask questions, share knowledge, and collaborate on projects.

The strong user communities surrounding macOS and Linux provide invaluable support and resources and contribute to the ongoing development and improvement of these operating systems.

Similarity #7: High Level of Customizability

A key aspect that draws users to macOS and Linux is their high level of customizability.

Both operating systems allow users to tailor their computing experience to their preferences, making creating a personalized and efficient workspace easier.

macOS offers numerous built-in customization options, such as modifying the appearance of the dock, adjusting system settings, and choosing from a variety of desktop backgrounds.

Additionally, macOS supports third-party applications like Alfred and BetterTouchTool, which let users create custom shortcuts, workflows, and gestures to boost productivity and enhance the user experience.

Linux takes customization to a whole new level with its wide array of desktop environments, window managers, and themes.

You can choose from popular desktop environments like GNOME, KDE Plasma, and Xfce, each offering a unique look and feel.

If you want to go further, you can dive into window managers like i3 or Openbox and create a customized desktop experience.

Whether you’re a macOS user who appreciates the polish and simplicity of Apple’s design or a Linux enthusiast who loves to tweak every aspect of your desktop, both operating systems provide the flexibility and control you need to make your computer truly your own.


There you have it! These nine similarities between macOS and Linux show that, despite their differences, these two operating systems share a surprising amount in common.

From their UNIX-based origins and powerful command-line interfaces to their strong security features and vibrant user communities, macOS and Linux have a lot to offer their users.

So, whether you’re a dedicated macOS user, a Linux enthusiast, or just exploring the world of operating systems, you can appreciate the unique qualities and shared features that make both macOS and Linux such exceptional platforms.


Comparison: Windows vs. macOS Ram Usage [Pros & Cons]

When it comes to the world of operating systems, the age-old debate of Windows vs. macOS RAM usage is a hot topic.

Whether you’re a die-hard Windows user or a loyal macOS fan, understanding how each operating system manages memory can help you decide which is best for you.

In this blog post, we’ll dive deep into the nitty-gritty details of macOS memory management vs. Windows and answer the burning question:

Does Windows use more RAM than macOS? Or is it the other way around?

Fun Fact #1: Did you know that macOS was initially called "Mac OS X" when it was first released in 2001? It was rebranded as "macOS" in 2016 to align with Apple's other operating systems, like iOS, watchOS, and tvOS.

Understanding RAM Usage

RAM, or Random Access Memory, is a crucial component of any computer. It acts as your computer’s short-term memory, temporarily storing data and instructions that your CPU needs for quick access.

Unlike your hard drive or SSD, which stores data long-term, RAM only holds onto information while your computer is powered on. When you shut down your device, everything stored in RAM is wiped clean.

So, why does RAM usage matter? Well, having enough RAM is essential for your computer to run smoothly.

When your computer runs out of RAM, it starts using your hard drive or SSD to compensate, which is much slower. This can lead to lag, sluggish performance, and a less-than-stellar user experience.

Understanding how Windows and macOS manage RAM will help you determine which operating system is more efficient and better suited to your needs.

Fun Fact #2: In 1951, the first computer to use magnetic core memory, a precursor to modern RAM, was the MIT Whirlwind. The Whirlwind's memory was able to store 2,048 words (equivalent to 8,192 bytes) and had a cycle time of 16 microseconds.

RAM Usage in Windows

How Windows Manages RAM

Windows has come a long way in terms of memory management since its early days.

The operating system intelligently allocates RAM to applications, background processes, and system services to ensure optimal performance.

One of the key features of Windows RAM management is its use of virtual memory.

When your system runs low on physical RAM, Windows creates a “page file” on your hard drive or SSD to store data that would otherwise be held in RAM temporarily.

Pros and Cons of Windows RAM Usage


  • Windows is designed to work with a wide range of hardware, making it compatible with both low-end and high-end machines.
  • The operating system’s virtual memory feature can help prevent system crashes when running low on RAM.


  • Some users may find that Windows tends to use more RAM than macOS, especially when running multiple applications simultaneously.
  • Windows may require more frequent restarts to free up RAM and maintain optimal performance.

RAM Usage in macOS

How macOS Manages RAM

macOS boasts a different approach to memory management compared to Windows.

Apple’s operating system is known for its efficient RAM usage, which can be attributed to features like memory compression and automatic memory management.

When macOS detects that it’s running low on available RAM, it compresses the data in memory to free up space for other applications.

Additionally, macOS automatically allocates and deallocates memory for applications, ensuring that each app has the resources it needs without hogging RAM.

Pros and Cons of macOS RAM Usage


  • macOS is typically more efficient with RAM usage, allowing for smoother performance even with multiple applications open.
  • The operating system’s memory compression feature helps reduce the need for virtual memory, preventing slowdowns caused by accessing data stored on the hard drive or SSD.


  • macOS is designed primarily for Apple hardware, which can be more expensive than comparable Windows machines.
  • Some users may experience compatibility issues with certain software or hardware, as macOS doesn’t support as wide a range of devices as Windows.

Comparing Windows and macOS RAM Usage

Head-to-Head: Performance & Efficiency

When it comes to performance and efficiency, the debate of “macOS memory management vs Windows” is a close one.

While Windows is known for its compatibility with a wide range of hardware, macOS is often praised for its efficient RAM usage, which can lead to smoother performance, especially when multitasking.

It’s important to note that individual experiences may vary depending on the hardware and software used.

Impact on Battery Life

Battery life is another factor to consider when comparing Windows and macOS RAM usage.

Efficient memory management can help conserve battery life, as the system doesn’t have to work as hard to shuffle data between RAM and storage.

In general, macOS tends to have better battery life due to its optimized memory management and other power-saving features.

Which One is Better for Different Users?

Ultimately, the decision between Windows and macOS will depend on the user’s specific needs and preferences. Here’s a quick rundown to help you decide:

  • Windows: Best for users who need compatibility with a wide range of hardware and software or those who prefer a more customizable and familiar operating system.
  • macOS: Ideal for users who value efficient RAM usage, longer battery life, and seamless integration with other Apple devices.

Tips for Optimizing RAM Usage

Whether you’re using Windows or macOS, optimizing your RAM usage can help you get the most out of your computer. Here are some tips for both operating systems:


  • Close unnecessary applications: Make sure to close any apps you’re not using to free up RAM for other tasks.
  • Adjust performance settings: In the Control Panel, you can adjust your computer’s performance settings to prioritize speed over visual effects.
  • Use a lightweight browser: Some browsers, like Google Chrome, can be resource hogs. Consider using a lighter alternative, such as Microsoft Edge or Firefox.
  • Disable startup programs: Prevent unnecessary programs from running at startup by using the Task Manager to disable them.


  • Quit unused apps: Just like on Windows, be sure to quit any apps you’re not using to free up memory.
  • Monitor RAM usage: Keep an eye on your RAM usage with the built-in Activity Monitor, and close apps with high memory usage if necessary.
  • Keep your software up-to-date: Apple regularly releases updates to improve performance and optimize memory usage. Make sure your macOS and apps are up-to-date.
  • Use App Nap: App Nap is a macOS feature that automatically slows down inactive apps to save energy and free up RAM.


In this blog post, we’ve explored the ins and outs of Windows vs. macOS RAM usage, shedding light on the differences in how each operating system manages memory.

While Windows offers greater compatibility with a variety of hardware and software, macOS is often recognized for its efficient RAM usage and longer battery life.

Ultimately, the choice between Windows and macOS comes down to your personal preferences and needs.

By considering factors like performance, efficiency, battery life, and compatibility, you can decide which operating system is right for you.